What Does It Actually Cost to Build an AI Product?
AI development cost is one of the most misunderstood numbers in the startup world. Founders either dramatically overshoot (hiring a 10-person ML team before validating an idea) or dramatically undershoot (assuming a weekend prototype scales to production).
This post breaks down actual costs by phase, team composition, and infrastructure — so you can budget with real numbers, not rough guesses.
The short answer: a well-scoped AI MVP costs between $25,000–$80,000 depending on complexity. A production system with real users costs more. Here's exactly why.
Phase 1: Discovery and Scoping ($0–$5,000)
Before writing code, you need to know what you're building. This phase includes:
- Defining the core AI workflow (what the model does, what data it needs)
- Evaluating model options (GPT-4o, Claude, open-source)
- Assessing data requirements and availability
- Estimating API costs at your projected usage volume
- Technical architecture decision: build vs. buy
If you're working with an experienced AI agency, discovery is often a fixed-fee engagement ($2,000–$5,000) that produces a scope document and a cost model. If you're doing this internally, the cost is engineering time.
Skipping this phase is the most expensive mistake in AI development. Teams that jump straight to building regularly spend 3–4x more correcting architecture decisions made without proper scoping.
Phase 2: AI MVP Development ($20,000–$60,000)
A focused AI MVP — a working product that validates your core use case with real users — typically takes 3–6 weeks with the right team.
Team Cost Breakdown
In-house hiring:
- Senior AI/ML engineer: $180,000–$250,000/year ($15,000–$21,000/month)
- Full-stack engineer: $140,000–$180,000/year ($12,000–$15,000/month)
- 2-person team for 6 weeks: $54,000–$90,000
Agency/sprint model:
- Fixed-scope AI sprints typically run $25,000–$60,000 for a production-ready MVP
- Faster time-to-market (3 weeks vs 6+) because experienced teams don't re-learn patterns each project
- No recruiting overhead, no benefits, no equity
For a detailed comparison of these models, see in-house vs agency AI development.
What's Included in MVP Development
A proper AI MVP build includes:
| Component | Cost Driver | |-----------|-------------| | Core AI pipeline | Prompt engineering, RAG setup, evaluation | | Frontend/UI | Chat interface, result display, feedback mechanisms | | Backend API | Authentication, session management, request handling | | Database | User data, conversation history, vector store | | Deployment | Cloud hosting, CI/CD, monitoring | | Evaluation suite | Test cases, accuracy benchmarks, regression tests |
Teams that skip the evaluation suite pay for it later — in production regressions they can't diagnose. See the full list of AI MVP mistakes founders make.
Phase 3: LLM API Costs (Ongoing)
This is where AI product economics differ from traditional SaaS. You have a variable cost per user interaction — every message, generation, or AI action costs money.
Model Pricing Reference (2026)
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | |-------|----------------------|------------------------| | GPT-4o | $2.50 | $10.00 | | GPT-4o mini | $0.15 | $0.60 | | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | $3.00 | $15.00 | | Claude 3.5 Haiku | $0.80 | $4.00 | | Gemini 1.5 Flash | $0.075 | $0.30 |
Cost Per User Interaction: Real Examples
Customer support chatbot (moderate context, ~1,000 tokens/exchange):
- GPT-4o mini: ~$0.00075/message — essentially free at small scale
- GPT-4o: ~$0.0125/message — $125/10,000 messages/day = $3,750/month
Document analysis tool (large context, ~10,000 tokens/request):
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: ~$0.18/request — at 1,000 requests/day = $180/day = $5,400/month
Code generation assistant (mixed context, ~3,000 tokens/generation):
- GPT-4o: ~$0.04/generation — at 500 generations/day = $20/day = $600/month
The lesson: model selection is a product economics decision, not just a quality decision. Running a frontier model on every query when a smaller model handles 80% of cases adequately is burning margin unnecessarily.
Smart AI products implement model routing — routing simple queries to cheap models (GPT-4o mini, Gemini Flash) and only escalating to expensive models when complexity demands it. This typically reduces API costs by 40–70%.
Phase 4: Infrastructure Costs (Ongoing)
Beyond model API costs, your AI application has standard cloud infrastructure expenses.
Typical Monthly Infrastructure Stack
| Service | Early Stage | Growth Stage | |---------|-------------|--------------| | App hosting (Railway/Render) | $20–$50 | $200–$500 | | Database (Supabase/Postgres) | $25–$50 | $100–$300 | | Vector database | $0–$70 | $100–$500 | | Auth (Clerk/Auth0) | $0–$25 | $50–$200 | | Monitoring/logging | $0–$50 | $50–$200 | | CDN/storage | $5–$20 | $20–$100 | | Total infrastructure | $50–$265/mo | $520–$1,800/mo |
Early-stage infrastructure is cheap. Most AI products can run a fully-featured application for under $300/month in infrastructure costs before they have meaningful traffic.
The cost curve steepens at growth stage, but by then your revenue should be covering it.
Phase 5: Maintenance and Iteration ($5,000–$15,000/month)
A shipped AI product is not a finished AI product. Post-launch costs include:
- Prompt maintenance — Model updates, prompt regressions, accuracy drift as the underlying model changes
- Feature iteration — Adding capabilities based on user feedback
- Model upgrades — Switching to newer, better models as they release
- Evaluation monitoring — Catching quality regressions before users do
- Infrastructure scaling — Adapting to traffic growth
For a team running in-house: 1 engineer at $15,000–$20,000/month. For an agency retainer: typically $5,000–$10,000/month.
Full Cost Model: Typical AI SaaS Product
| Phase | Timeframe | Cost | |-------|-----------|------| | Discovery & scoping | 1–2 weeks | $3,000–$5,000 | | MVP development | 3–6 weeks | $25,000–$60,000 | | LLM API (first 6 months) | Monthly | $500–$5,000/mo | | Infrastructure (first 6 months) | Monthly | $150–$500/mo | | Maintenance & iteration | Monthly | $5,000–$15,000/mo | | Year 1 total | | $95,000–$280,000 |
The wide range reflects product complexity, team model (in-house vs. agency), and usage volume. An internal productivity tool with 50 users looks very different from a customer-facing SaaS product with 5,000.
How to Reduce AI Development Costs
- Start with a fixed-scope sprint — A 3-week focused build is faster and cheaper than an ongoing retainer with undefined scope
- Validate before you build — A $5,000 scoping engagement can prevent a $50,000 rebuild
- Use model routing from day one — Don't pay frontier model prices for queries a cheap model handles well
- RAG before fine-tuning — Fine-tuning is expensive; RAG is cheap and faster to iterate
- Measure your eval suite — Catching regressions early costs far less than debugging production failures
The Bottom Line
Building an AI product well costs real money — but far less than most founders assume when they think about hiring a full ML team. The best-value path for most startups is a focused sprint with an experienced AI team, followed by a lean in-house iteration model once the architecture is proven.
The worst-value path is an unbounded engineering effort without clear success criteria, trying to build a perfect system before validating that users want it at all.
Related: AI MVP Mistakes Founders Make · Build vs Buy Your AI MVP · How We Ship AI MVPs in 3 Weeks
[Want a real cost estimate for your specific AI build? Book a 15-min scope call → and we'll give you a line-item breakdown within 24 hours.]
Related Resources
More articles:
Our solution: AI Workflow Automation
Glossary:
Comparisons:
Free Tool: Get a real cost breakdown for your specific project — in-house vs. freelancers vs. our 3-week sprint. → AI MVP Cost Estimator