GRI vs. CSRD vs. TCFD: Which ESG Framework Do You Actually Need?
Three frameworks dominate ESG disclosure conversations in 2026: GRI Standards, CSRD/ESRS, and TCFD. Companies receive requests referencing all three, often from different stakeholders — and many assume they need to run three separate reporting programs.
They do not. The frameworks overlap significantly. Understanding the differences tells you which ones are mandatory for your situation, which are voluntary but useful, and where you can consolidate work.
The Short Answer
| Framework | Who Requires It | What It Covers | Assurance | |-----------|----------------|----------------|-----------| | GRI | Voluntary (widely requested by investors, NGOs) | Full ESG: environment, social, governance | Optional | | CSRD/ESRS | Mandatory for EU companies and large non-EU companies with EU revenue | Full ESG aligned to ESRS standards | Limited assurance required | | TCFD | Mandatory for UK listed companies; referenced by investors globally | Climate only: governance, strategy, risk, metrics | Voluntary |
GRI Standards: The Global Baseline
What it is: The Global Reporting Initiative publishes the most widely used sustainability reporting standards worldwide. GRI 2021 (the current universal standards) replaced earlier versions and is used by companies in 100+ countries.
Who uses it: Voluntary for most companies, but expected by institutional investors, sustainability raters (MSCI, Sustainalytics), and large enterprise customers doing supply chain ESG assessments. Many companies with no regulatory requirement still publish GRI-aligned reports to meet stakeholder expectations.
What it covers: Environmental (emissions, water, waste, biodiversity), Social (workers, communities, human rights, customers), and Governance (anti-corruption, tax, governance structure). GRI requires a content index mapping each disclosure to its location in your report.
The materiality approach: GRI uses "impact materiality" — you report on the topics where your company has the most significant impact on the world, regardless of financial impact on the company. This is different from financial materiality used in traditional accounting.
Effort to implement: Moderate. GRI reporting is flexible — you can report on selected topics rather than the full suite. The GRI content index is manageable once your data infrastructure is in place.
CSRD/ESRS: The EU Mandatory Standard
What it is: The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is EU law, replacing the older NFRD. It requires companies to report according to European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), which are the technical standards published by EFRAG.
Who it applies to:
- Large EU companies (500+ employees) — reporting from FY2024
- All large EU companies (250+ employees, 40M+ EUR revenue, or 20M+ EUR assets) — from FY2025
- EU-listed SMEs — from FY2026 (with opt-out until 2028)
- Non-EU companies with 150M+ EUR annual EU net turnover — from FY2028
What it covers: 12 ESRS topical standards covering climate (E1), pollution (E2), water (E3), biodiversity (E4), circular economy (E5), own workforce (S1), value chain workers (S2), affected communities (S3), consumers (S4), and governance (G1). ESRS E1 (climate) is the most demanding standard and largely absorbs TCFD requirements.
Key requirement: Double materiality assessment — you must assess both financial materiality (impact on company) and impact materiality (company's impact on environment/society). Topics that are material on either dimension require full disclosure.
Assurance: Limited assurance required from an accredited third party. EU regulation anticipates moving to reasonable assurance over time.
Effort to implement: High. 1,000+ potential data points across all ESRS standards. However, the double materiality assessment scopes which standards apply to your business — most companies report on a subset.
TCFD: The Climate-Focused Investor Standard
What it is: The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, now absorbed into the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (ISSB/IFRS S2), established a four-pillar framework for climate disclosure: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets.
Who requires it: Mandatory for premium-listed UK companies, large UK private companies, and UK financial services firms. Referenced (though not fully adopted) in SEC climate disclosure proposals. Widely requested by institutional investors globally even where not mandatory.
What it covers: Climate only. No social or governance topics beyond what relates to climate. Focuses on how the company's business strategy accounts for climate risk and opportunity, scenario analysis, and climate-related financial risks.
Relationship to ESRS E1: ESRS E1 (the CSRD climate standard) was explicitly designed to be interoperable with TCFD. A company that completes ESRS E1 disclosure has produced essentially everything TCFD requires. ISSB's IFRS S2 also incorporates TCFD recommendations directly.
Effort to implement: Moderate for established companies. The qualitative sections (governance, strategy, risk management) are narrative. The quantitative sections (Scope 1, 2, 3 emissions, climate risk exposure) require the same data infrastructure as CSRD E1.
Where They Overlap (and Where You Save Work)
The good news: there is substantial overlap in underlying data requirements.
Emissions data (Scope 1, 2, 3): Required by GRI 305, ESRS E1, and TCFD Metrics and Targets. Build the emissions calculation infrastructure once; it feeds all three.
Climate risk and scenario analysis: Central to TCFD; required under ESRS E1 for companies with material climate risk. One scenario analysis covers both.
Governance disclosures: GRI 2-9 through 2-28, ESRS G1, and TCFD Governance pillar all ask about board oversight of sustainability/climate topics. One governance description covers all three.
Energy consumption: GRI 302, ESRS E1-5. Same underlying data.
Workforce metrics: GRI 401-407, ESRS S1. Significant overlap on headcount, turnover, diversity, health and safety.
Which Framework to Prioritize
If you are an EU company subject to CSRD: ESRS is your mandatory requirement. ESRS E1 covers TCFD. GRI alignment is largely achieved through ESRS — you can produce a GRI content index mapping your ESRS disclosures to GRI requirements with modest additional effort.
If you are a UK listed company: TCFD is mandatory. If you also have EU operations, CSRD/ESRS may apply. GRI is voluntary but useful for investor relations.
If you are a US company with no EU revenue: No mandatory ESG framework currently, but GRI reporting and TCFD alignment are expected by institutional investors and major enterprise customers. ESG questionnaires from procurement teams typically reference GRI topics.
If you are a global company with EU, UK, and US operations: ESRS + TCFD covers your mandatory obligations. GRI content index adds modest effort and maximizes stakeholder coverage.
Related Resources
- ESG Reporting Automation: The Complete Guide
- CSRD Compliance
- ESG Data Pipeline
- Manual vs. Automated Scope 3 Tracking
100x Engineering helps companies implement ESG data infrastructure that covers GRI, CSRD/ESRS, and TCFD requirements from a single data layer. If you need framework guidance and implementation support, let's talk.